Category: Federal Rules of Evidence
-
RULE 801. DEFINITIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS ARTICLE; EXCLUSIONS FROM HEARSAY
RULE 801. DEFINITIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS ARTICLE; EXCLUSIONS FROM HEARSAY The following definitions apply under this article: (a) Statement. “Statement” means a person’s oral assertion, written assertion, or nonverbal conduct, if the person intended it as an assertion. (b) Declarant. “Declarant” means the person who made the statement. (c) Hearsay. “Hearsay” means a statement…
-
Advisory Committee Notes on Article VIII. Hearsay
ARTICLE VIII. HEARSAY Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules Introductory Note: The Hearsay Problem The factors to be considered in evaluating the testimony of a witness are perception, memory, and narration. Morgan, Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept, 62 Harv.L.Rev. 177 (1948), Selected Writings on Evidence and Trial 764, 765 (Fryer…
-
RULE 706. COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT WITNESSES
RULE 706. COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT WITNESSES (a) Appointment Process. On a party’s motion or on its own, the court may order the parties to show cause why expert witnesses should not be appointed and may ask the parties to submit nominations. The court may appoint any expert that the parties agree on and any of its…
-
RULE 705. DISCLOSING THE FACTS OR DATA UNDERLYING AN EXPERT’S OPINION
RULE 705. DISCLOSING THE FACTS OR DATA UNDERLYING AN EXPERT’S OPINION Unless the court orders otherwise, an expert may state an opinion — and give the reasons for it — without first testifying to the underlying facts or data. But the expert may be required to disclose those facts or data on cross-examination. Notes (Pub.…
-
RULE 704. OPINION ON AN ULTIMATE ISSUE
RULE 704. OPINION ON AN ULTIMATE ISSUE (a) In General — Not Automatically Objectionable. An opinion is not objectionable just because it embraces an ultimate issue. (b) Exception. In a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that…
-
RULE 703. BASES OF AN EXPERT’S OPINION TESTIMONY
RULE 703. BASES OF AN EXPERT’S OPINION TESTIMONY An expert may base an opinion on facts or data in the case that the expert has been made aware of or personally observed. If experts in the particular field would reasonably rely on those kinds of facts or data in forming an opinion on the subject,…
-
RULE 702. TESTIMONY BY EXPERT WITNESSES
RULE 702. TESTIMONY BY EXPERT WITNESSES A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a…
-
RULE 701. OPINION TESTIMONY BY LAY WITNESSES
RULE 701. OPINION TESTIMONY BY LAY WITNESSES If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is: (a) rationally based on the witness’s perception; (b) helpful to clearly understanding the witness’s testimony or to determining a fact in issue; and (c) not based…
-
RULE 615. EXCLUDING WITNESSES
RULE 615. EXCLUDING WITNESSES At a party’s request, the court must order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear other witnesses’ testimony. Or the court may do so on its own. But this rule does not authorize excluding: (a) a party who is a natural person; (b) an officer or employee of a party that…
-
RULE 614. COURT’S CALLING OR EXAMINING A WITNESS
RULE 614. COURT’S CALLING OR EXAMINING A WITNESS (a) Calling. The court may call a witness on its own or at a party’s request. Each party is entitled to cross-examine the witness. (b) Examining. The court may examine a witness regardless of who calls the witness. (c) Objections. A party may object to the court’s…
-
RULE 613. WITNESS’S PRIOR STATEMENT
RULE 613. WITNESS’S PRIOR STATEMENT (a) Showing or Disclosing the Statement During Examination. When examining a witness about the witness’s prior statement, a party need not show it or disclose its contents to the witness. But the party must, on request, show it or disclose its contents to an adverse party’s attorney. (b) Extrinsic Evidence…
-
RULE 612. WRITING USED TO REFRESH A WITNESS’S MEMORY
RULE 612. WRITING USED TO REFRESH A WITNESS’S MEMORY (a) Scope. This rule gives an adverse party certain options when a witness uses a writing to refresh memory: (1) while testifying; or (2) before testifying, if the court decides that justice requires the party to have those options. (b) Adverse Party’s Options; Deleting Unrelated…
-
RULE 611. MODE AND ORDER OF EXAMINING WITNESSES AND PRESENTING EVIDENCE
RULE 611. MODE AND ORDER OF EXAMINING WITNESSES AND PRESENTING EVIDENCE (a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses…
-
RULE 610. RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR OPINIONS
RULE 610. RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR OPINIONS Evidence of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness’s credibility. Notes (Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1936; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.) Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed…
-
RULE 609. IMPEACHMENT BY EVIDENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTION
RULE 609. IMPEACHMENT BY EVIDENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTION (a) In General. The following rules apply to attacking a witness’s character for truthfulness by evidence of a criminal conviction: (1) for a crime that, in the convicting jurisdiction, was punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than one year, the evidence: (A) must…
-
RULE 608. A WITNESS’S CHARACTER FOR TRUTHFULNESS OR UNTRUTHFULNESS
RULE 608. A WITNESS’S CHARACTER FOR TRUTHFULNESS OR UNTRUTHFULNESS (a) Reputation or Opinion Evidence. A witness’s credibility may be attacked or supported by testimony about the witness’s reputation for having a character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, or by testimony in the form of an opinion about that character. But evidence of truthful character is admissible…
-
RULE 607. WHO MAY IMPEACH A WITNESS
RULE 607. WHO MAY IMPEACH A WITNESS Any party, including the party that called the witness, may attack the witness’s credibility. Notes (Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1934; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.) Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules The traditional…
-
RULE 606. JUROR’S COMPETENCY AS A WITNESS
RULE 606. JUROR’S COMPETENCY AS A WITNESS (a) At the Trial. A juror may not testify as a witness before the other jurors at the trial. If a juror is called to testify, the court must give a party an opportunity to object outside the jury’s presence. (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of…
-
RULE 605. JUDGE’S COMPETENCY AS A WITNESS
RULE 605. JUDGE’S COMPETENCY AS A WITNESS The presiding judge may not testify as a witness at the trial. A party need not object to preserve the issue. Notes (Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1934; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.) Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules In view…
-
RULE 604. INTERPRETER
RULE 604. INTERPRETER An interpreter must be qualified and must give an oath or affirmation to make a true translation. Notes (Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1934; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.) Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules The rule implements…